| From: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison |
| Date: | 2004-02-23 18:41:38 |
| Message-ID: | 403A4962.9030505@sympatico.ca |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Didn't somebody mentioned some time ago that there was a postgresql
benchtest suite that could be downloaded and anybody could use it
against other engines?
Merlin Moncure wrote:
>Robert Treat wrote:
>
>
>>This came across the wire yesterday, thought I would pass it along. It
>>compares PostgreSQL vs. a "Major Proprietary Database"
>>
>>http://research.rem.nl/performance.html
>>
>>
>
>Are you (or anybody else) aware of any similar studies comparing pg to
>SQL Server? A study detailing not just performance but also reliability
>and administrative advantages, as well as PHB type stuff such as TCO,
>ROI, etc. would be nice.
>
>On another note, it's a pretty safe bet for this site to expect a
>takedown notice from the good folks at Oracle who have structured their
>license agreements to prevent precisely this kind of study from getting
>published.
>
>Merlin
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-02-23 23:43:50 | MySQL Licence change article - eweek |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-02-23 18:38:00 | Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison |