Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pl/Java - next step?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Date: 2004-02-22 20:50:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
One perfectly good reason for this scenario is portability between 
postgres and any database implementing the standard (e.g. Oracle).



Dave Cramer wrote:

>Not to minimize your work, as I think it is great, but this particular
>use-case I consider to be overkill for pl/java. It is probably easier to
>use pl/pgsql if all you want to do is calculations.
>We had suggested an online chat to discuss this, when would you be
>available for that? What timezone are you in. Laszlo is in hungary, and
>I am in canada, so we are likely spread allover the the map .
>On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 12:28, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>>>1) Using JNI, you probably still want to communicate with another
>>>running java process.
>>B.T.W. I don't really agree on "probably". There are numerous cases when you
>>will be happy just communicating with the database, communicate with another
>>remote resource (message queue typically), or not communicate at all
>>(calculations, etc.).
>>Thomas Hallgren

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-22 21:47:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Mac OS X, PostgreSQL, PL/Tcl
Previous:From: HORNYAK LaszloDate: 2004-02-22 20:33:21
Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group