Re: Error-safe user functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Date: 2022-12-07 17:17:34
Message-ID: 4038712.1670433454@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> In my attempt to implement CAST...DEFAULT, I noticed that I immediately
> needed an
> OidInputFunctionCallSafe, which was trivial but maybe something we want to
> add to the infra patch, but the comments around that function also somewhat
> indicate that we might want to just do the work in-place and call
> InputFunctionCallSafe directly. Open to both ideas.

I'm a bit skeptical of that. IMO using OidInputFunctionCall is only
appropriate in places that will be executed just once per query.
Otherwise, unless you have zero concern for performance, you should
be caching the function lookup. (The test functions in my 0003 patch
illustrate the standard way to do that within SQL-callable functions.
If you're implementing CAST as a new kind of executable expression,
the lookup would likely happen in expression compilation.)

I don't say that OidInputFunctionCallSafe won't ever be useful, but
I doubt it's what we want in CAST.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-12-07 17:20:55 Re: Error-safe user functions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-12-07 17:17:25 Re: Error-safe user functions