Re: WIP: generalized index constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Date: 2009-07-11 23:06:09
Message-ID: 403.1247353569@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> Is it possible to re-add amgettuple to GIN, and just set the cost high
> so it's not chosen by the planner? Or is there some reason this is
> fundamentally a bad idea (or won't work at all)?

We wouldn't have deleted it if it were practical to make it work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-07-11 23:48:49 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-07-11 22:24:10 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints