Re: log_line_info plan

Tom Lane said:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines
>> with info via a printf-style string.
>
>> Any comments or suggestions before I start?
>
> I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch.

Not that I can see. He did just apply the log_disconnections patch, but I
had split that out from this facility - back in August I did them together
in one never-applied patch.

> No
> problem with yanking it out for a better version --- but please supply
> the update as a diff from CVS tip. Fewer chances for error that way.
>

I always do a CVS update before making a patch (unless I forget).

cheers

andrew