Re: pg_generate_sequence and info_schema patch (Was: SE

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Alex <alex(at)meerkatsoft(dot)com>, Lada 'Ray' Lostak <ray(at)unreal64(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_generate_sequence and info_schema patch (Was: SE
Date: 2004-02-02 19:08:05
Message-ID: 401EA015.7070106@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Claudio Natoli wrote:
> [Of course, whether or not this is the best behaviour (as opposed to error)
> is an arguable point.]

Thanks for the input. I think I'll go with Tom's nearby advice and make
it an error.

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-02 19:48:27 log session end - again
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-02 17:34:29 Re: reading uninitialized buffer