Re: Do we still need gen_node_support.pl's nodetag ABI stability check?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we still need gen_node_support.pl's nodetag ABI stability check?
Date: 2026-04-15 18:45:07
Message-ID: 401DA47A-D9C7-4EEE-B1A8-083B0C9A92E1@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 15 Apr 2026, at 20:13, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Barring objections, I'll push this soon.

+1, the new checks are far more comprehensive. Looks good from a readthrough
and grepping the codebase doesn't turn up any other mentions.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-04-15 18:49:06 Re: Add errdetail() with PID and UID about source of termination signal
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2026-04-15 18:41:22 Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes