Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> ... Another advantage of master-only is a guarantee against
> disrupting time-critical patches. (It would be ugly to push back branches and
> sort out the master push later, but it doesn't obstruct the mission.)
Hm, doesn't it? I had the idea that "git push" is atomic --- either all
the per-branch commits succeed, or they all fail. I might be wrong.
regards, tom lane