| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |
| Date: | 2004-08-01 00:14:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4010.1091319264@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Even if Savepoints don't make it, we'll still have:
Savepoints are in, as is exception-trapping in functions (at least
plpgsql, the other PLs are on their own :-().
Some other major improvements you didn't mention:
Cross-datatype comparisons are indexable (at least for common
combinations); this solves a huge performance gotcha
Dependency-aware pg_dump
Much more complete support for rowtype operations
> This is more features worth mentioning than we've ever had in a single release
> before -- and if you consider several add-ons which have been
> implemented/improved at the same time (Slony, PL/Java, etc.) it's even more
> momentous. If this isn't 8.0, then what will be?
I tend to agree, and was about to bring up the point myself.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-01 00:24:58 | Re: About pgevent |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-31 22:44:17 | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |