| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate | 
| Date: | 2004-08-01 00:14:24 | 
| Message-ID: | 4010.1091319264@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Even if Savepoints don't make it, we'll still have:
Savepoints are in, as is exception-trapping in functions (at least
plpgsql, the other PLs are on their own :-().
Some other major improvements you didn't mention:
Cross-datatype comparisons are indexable (at least for common
combinations); this solves a huge performance gotcha
Dependency-aware pg_dump
Much more complete support for rowtype operations
> This is more features worth mentioning than we've ever had in a single release 
> before -- and if you consider several add-ons which have been 
> implemented/improved at the same time (Slony, PL/Java, etc.) it's even more 
> momentous.   If this isn't 8.0, then what will be?   
I tend to agree, and was about to bring up the point myself.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-01 00:24:58 | Re: About pgevent | 
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-31 22:44:17 | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |