Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

From: Charles Tassell <ctassell(at)isn(dot)net>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Date: 2000-11-15 21:54:41
Message-ID: 4.3.2.7.2.20001115174923.00ba0a40@mailer.isn.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Just a note, I've been using Postgres 7.02 and PHP 4.02 or 4.03 for about a
month in a couple sites, and haven't experienced any problems with
persistent connections. Problem might have been fixed in one of the point
releases, or maybe I just don't have enough different db connections to
trigger it.

At 02:05 PM 11/15/00, Adam Lang wrote:
>PHP 4 was having problems with persistent connections (not sure if with just
>pgsql or all dbs). Maybe that is why they didn't use it.
>
>Adam Lang
>Systems Engineer
>Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <joseph(at)randomnetworks(dot)com>
>To: "carl garland" <carlhgarland(at)hotmail(dot)com>
>Cc: <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>; <RDNELSON(at)co(dot)centre(dot)pa(dot)us>;
><davidb(at)vectormath(dot)com>; <mfork(at)toledolink(dot)com>; <poulc(at)cs(dot)auc(dot)dk>;
><pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote:
> >
> > # >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went
> > # >significantly above 10/sec?
> > #
> > # I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They
>are
> > # using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional
> > # overhead of making the db connection. Now if they had used AOLserver
>with
> > # its persistent db connecction pooling scheme they may have faired better
>;)
> >
> > I haven't actually looked at their code they used to test with to
> > see if they are actually using it, but Apache/PHP has the ability to do
> > persistent db connections. I would be surprised that someone like Tim (
> > who seems to have done a fair bit of php with db stuff) would not make use
> > of such a feature.
> >
> > If you can point out an example of where they are not using this
> > feature I will gladly stand corrected.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > | Joseph Scott The Office Of Water Programs |
> > | joseph(at)randomnetworks(dot)com joseph(dot)scott(at)owp(dot)csus(dot)edu |
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Larson 2000-11-16 03:30:38 AIX 4.3.3 and postgresql 7.0.3
Previous Message Philip Hallstrom 2000-11-15 20:56:52 Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] [RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENT] v7.0.3 *Final* now Available

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-16 04:28:53 Re: termcap and curses
Previous Message Martin A. Marques 2000-11-15 21:44:52 WAL and offline backups