| From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Table modification |
| Date: | 2001-10-02 20:29:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4.2.0.58.20011002215716.024659b0@pop.freesurf.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
>OK, following some tests I find that PostgreSQL doesn't validate a PL/pgSQL
>function when it builds it as I thought. I tend to use plain SQL functions
>which are validated so the situation you describe above cannot occur. That
>is why I figure that the best validation is to actually build each object.
I did this test: create functionA based on functionB, drop functionB,
create functionB.
functionA is not broken. Things are much more easy than I thought !!!!!
No need to use development tables for functions !!!!!
OK, I admit there are serious **holes** in my point of view.
Later, /JMP
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2001-10-02 21:51:37 | Re: Table modification |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2001-10-02 19:13:52 | Re: Table modification |