From: | Matthew Hagerty <matthew(at)venux(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] 8K query limit in 6.5? |
Date: | 1999-07-13 16:02:18 |
Message-ID: | 4.1.19990713115720.009c84b0@mail.venux.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
stir, stir, stir... please make this bigger! Or tell me how and I'll do it. :)
Is it really such a big deal to increase the size of a query that pg can
handle? I'm talking about the size of a query submitted to pg, from what I
understand there is no limit on the record (tuple) size that can be
returned from pg. Is my understanding correct?
Thanks,
Matthew
At 09:59 AM 7/13/99 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Matthew Hagerty <matthew(at)venux(dot)net> writes:
>> Was the 8K query limit increased in 6.5?
>
>Nope.
>
>I tried to stir up some enthusiasm for fixing it in 6.6, but didn't
>have much success --- too soon to say whether it will happen for 6.6
>or be postponed again.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bradford F. Lyon | 1999-07-13 16:34:07 | sub |
Previous Message | Herouth Maoz | 1999-07-13 16:01:05 | Re: [ADMIN] Extra Postgres Processes |