From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: wrong query results on bf leafhopper |
Date: | 2025-05-19 14:51:46 |
Message-ID: | 3mac44qtmvbnelffdrqllecrui6zeonyyhawdh2zwklm2hcldl@5jk4liymtnd7 |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-05-19 12:49:26 +0930, Robins Tharakan wrote:
> Hi Andres,
>
> On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 22:49, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > There have been other odd things on leafhopper, see e.g.:
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/35d87371-f3ab-42c8-9aac-bb39ab5bd987%40gmail.com
> > https://postgr.es/m/Z4npAKvchWzKfb_r%40paquier.xyz
> >
>
> Any chances this could be linked to the openssl bug [2] highlighted
> in this other hacker thread [1]? The postgres issue is quite unrelated,
> but the openssl bug seems non-trivial and may be good to rule out.
>
> To confirm, leafhopper is on Graviton4, uses openssl v3.2 and is
> compiled --with-openssl. I've been unable to triage the recent
> leafhopper failures myself and upgrading its openssl (to v3.3+)
> has been a pending task (just to rule it out).
I don't really see how it could conceivably be related, unless we are talking
about a general broken compiler issue or such.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-05-19 15:05:30 | Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-05-19 14:45:47 | Re: Violation of principle that plan trees are read-only |