Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled
Date: 2022-09-06 13:55:52
Message-ID: 3f2c09a6-0b7d-7004-3356-b2f3f520f3ce@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/5/22 10:03 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 1:51 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>>> On 9/5/22 7:18 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
>>>> Well I was about to commit this, but beta4 just got stamped (but not
>>>> yet tagged). I see now that Jonathan (with RMT hat on, CC'd) meant
>>>> commits should be in by the *start* of the 5th AoE, not the end. So
>>>> the procedural/RMT question is whether it's still possible to close
>>>> this item in beta4.
>>
>>> Presumably because Tom stamped it, the released is wrapped so it
>>> wouldn't make Beta 4, but I defer to him to see if it can be included
>>> with the tag.
>>
>> I already made the tarballs available to packagers, so adding this
>> would involve a re-wrap and great confusion. In any case, I'm not
>> a fan of pushing fixes within a day or two of the wrap deadline,
>> let alone after it; you get inadequate buildfarm coverage when you
>> cut corners that way. I think this one missed the boat.
>
> Got it. Yeah I knew it was going to be a close thing with a problem
> diagnosed on Thursday/Friday before a Monday wrap, even before I
> managed to confuse myself about dates and times. Thanks both.

To close this loop, I added a section for "fixed before RC1" to Open
Items since this is presumably the next release. We can include it there
once committed.

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-09-06 14:05:00 Re: Modernizing our GUC infrastructure
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2022-09-06 13:38:01 Re: HOT chain validation in verify_heapam()