Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Srinath Reddy <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Date: 2025-07-21 20:41:03
Message-ID: 3f22a8bb-29e8-40cc-97a1-309181da2c13@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-07-17 Th 6:18 AM, Mahendra Singh Thalor wrote
>>>>>> --- a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c
>>>>>> +++ b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * read_one_statement
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * This will start reading from passed file pointer using fgetc and read till
>>>>>> + * semicolon(sql statement terminator for global.dat file)
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * EOF is returned if end-of-file input is seen; time to shut down.
>>>>> What makes it okay to use this particular subset of SQL lexing?
>>>> To support complex syntax, we used this code from another file.
>>> I'm hearing that you copied this code from somewhere. Running
>>> "git grep 'time to shut down'" suggests you copied it from
>>> InteractiveBackend(). Is that right? I do see other similarities between
>>> read_one_statement() and InteractiveBackend().
>>>
>>> Copying InteractiveBackend() provides negligible assurance that this is the
>>> right subset of SQL lexing. Only single-user mode uses InteractiveBackend().
>>> Single-user mode survives mostly as a last resort for recovering from having
>>> reached xidStopLimit, is rarely used, and only superusers write queries to it.
>> Yes, we copied this from InteractiveBackend to read statements from
>> global.dat file.

Maybe we should ensure that identifiers with CR or LF are turned into
Unicode quoted identifiers, so each SQL statement would always only
occupy one line. Or just reject role and tablespace names with CR or LF
altogether, just as we do for database names.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-07-21 20:52:12 Re: pgsql: Introduce pg_shmem_allocations_numa view
Previous Message Nico Williams 2025-07-21 20:34:56 Re: Proposal: QUALIFY clause