| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tollef Fog Heen <tollef(dot)fog(dot)heen(at)collabora(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Subject: | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq |
| Date: | 2010-02-12 10:15:32 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb1002120215v52c97397s348e4f7efdf84754@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> keepalive doesn't work,
>> then it would have to wait for a long time until it detects
>> the outage.
>
> I'm not really sure what you mean. In this scenario, would it take as
> long as it would have taken had keepalives not been used?
Please see the following threads.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-08/msg00098.php
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0508.2/0757.html
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-02-12 10:23:59 | Re: Streaming Replication docs |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-02-12 10:15:31 | Re: Streaming Replication docs |