| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication? |
| Date: | 2009-12-24 08:53:53 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0912240053u389e1cd8pd096237e13cd10b2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The code has always been capable of starting without this, which was
> considered a feature to be able start from a hot copy. I would like to
> do as you suggest, but it would remove the feature. This would be a
> great example of why I don't want too many ways to start HS.
Please tell me what is "a hot copy". You mean standalone hot backup?
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-STANDALONE
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-24 09:03:02 | Re: Streaming Rep - 2-phase backups and reducing time to full replication |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-12-24 08:38:24 | Re: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication? |