Re: Application name patch - v4

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Date: 2009-11-30 03:20:53
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0911291920n53a3e46dm87f2cfafbb52a0d2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Why doesn't application_name appear in postgresql.conf.sample?
>>> That is expected to be set from only libpq?
>>
>> It would seem pretty silly to set it in the conf file.  You *can*,
>> if you want, but I see no reason to list it there.
>
> Yeah, I see your point. But, is it a policy not to put such parameter
> (other than that for debug) on postgresql.conf.sample?

Ooops! I missed GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE parameters. Sorry for noise.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-11-30 03:34:57 Re: Add YAML option to explain
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2009-11-30 03:18:22 Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication