On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Yes, the old xlog itself is not used again. But, the *old file* might
>> be recycled and used later. The case that I'm looking at is that the
>> symlink to a temporary area is recycled. Am I missing something?
> Actually, I think the right fix for that would be to add defenses to
> xlog.c to not try to "recycle" a file that is a symlink.
OK, I tweaked Aidan's patch. Thanks Aidan!
- use lstat instead of stat
- add #if HAVE_WORKING_LINK and #endif code
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2009-06-02 03:22:13|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L')|
|Previous:||From: Scott Bailey||Date: 2009-06-02 01:55:04|
|Subject: Re: ruby connect|