| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Date: | 2009-02-25 21:15:50 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0902251315wc1d6bcfh7d04e31b30f4fef6@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> That is exactly what I am against. Note the words "get rid of".
>
> This prevents parallel data transfer, use of split mirrors and various
> other techniques. It sounds neater, but it implies removal of useful
> features.
OK, ISTM that my description was confusing you, so I removed that statement
from the TODO item on wiki.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NTT%27s_Development_Projects#Todo_and_Claim
Again, I'm not planning to get rid of any existing capabilities unless
necessary.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-02-25 21:24:19 | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-02-25 21:11:58 | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |