Re: Variadic polymorpic functions

From: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Variadic polymorpic functions
Date: 2010-01-27 15:49:05
Message-ID: 3eff28921001270749x67e02cc5j8175efedee128a09@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2010/1/27 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hello
>
> I add sprintf function. Now I think, we can add new contrib module
> (string functions) with both function - format and sprintf. These
> functions are relative different, so they can exists separately.
> Format is simpler and faster. Sprintf is more powerful but slower.
>
> postgres=# select pst.format('now is %', current_time);
>          format
> ---------------------------
>  now is 16:34:26.203728+01
> (1 row)
>
> postgres=# select pst.sprintf('now is %s', current_time);
>         sprintf
> --------------------------
>  now is 16:34:45.24919+01
>
> Regards
> Pavel Stehule

Yeah!

But why still on separate schema?
I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." anymore.
Just like (most of) all other contrib mudules ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-01-27 15:52:10 Re: Variadic polymorpic functions
Previous Message Igor Neyman 2010-01-27 15:40:51 relation between records in "main" and "toast" tables