| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [19] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER |
| Date: | 2026-03-14 03:02:04 |
| Message-ID: | 3ebceab06a3fc076ce3041af1d8c2164eeecff52.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2026-03-07 at 12:31 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Isn't it better to keep this along with other oids in the beginning
> of
> the catalog, say after subowner? It will also avoid padding before
> subserver field.
Right now it's close to conninfo, which seems reasonable. The other
fields don't seem very concerned about alignment, but if it's an issue
we can rearrange subserver along with submaxretention.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Japin Li | 2026-03-14 03:07:02 | Re: Use SMgrRelation instead of SMgrRelationData * in pgaio_io_set_target_smgr() |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2026-03-14 00:50:50 | Re: index prefetching |