Re: missing toast table for pg_policy

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
Date: 2018-07-12 11:16:35
Message-ID: 3ea2c97d-1f80-f69d-ac3c-1463a021659c@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10.07.18 03:29, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 09:19:35PM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
>> If you can wait for the next commitfest (the original one I put the
>> patch into, i.e. September) I am committed to making it happen. But if
>> you are anxious to getting this into the current commitfest, go for it.
>> I am in the middle of a move from California to Florida and don't think
>> I will realistically have time this month.
>
> Oh, OK, thanks for your reply. Peter, would you like to accelerate
> things here? I recall that you worked lately on another item dependent
> on the one discussed here. I can personally wait a couple of CFs, v12
> development has just begun.

To get things rolling, I have committed the regression test addition.

I'll look through the other stuff soon.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-07-12 12:28:52 Re: Copy function for logical replication slots
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-07-12 11:14:28 Re: pgsql: Allow using the updated tuple while moving it to a different par