From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress |
Date: | 2019-02-12 01:29:40 |
Message-ID: | 3e781ef4-04cb-5670-ee2b-7c0e99f72ece@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019/02/11 23:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Now that I see this in action, it makes the actual test results harder
>> to identify flying by. I understand the desire to collect this timing
>> data, but that is a special use case and not relevant to the normal use
>> of the test suite, which is to see whether the test passes. Can we make
>> this optional please?
>
> Well, I want the buildfarm to produce this info, so it's hard to see
> how to get that without the timings being included by default. I take
> your point that it makes the display look a bit cluttered, though.
> Would it help to put more whitespace between the status and the timing?
+1. Maybe, not as much whitespace as we get today between the test name
and "... ok", but at least more than just a single space.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-12 01:39:01 | Re: Connection slots reserved for replication |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2019-02-12 01:27:56 | Re: BUG #15629: Typo in Documentation |