Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: "nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "'robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com'" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq
Date: 2020-04-08 12:39:05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/24/20 10:58 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 11/29/19 12:22 AM, nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>> I couldn't understand what you meant.
>> Do you say that we shouldn't change pqWait() behavior?
>> Or should I modify my patch to use pqDropConnection()?
> This patch no longer applies:
> CF entry has been updated to Waiting on Author.
> More importantly it looks like there is still no consensus on this
> patch, which is an uncommitted part of a previous patch [1].
> Unless somebody chimes in I'll mark this Returned with Feedback at the
> end of the CF.

Marked Returned with Feedback.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-04-08 12:43:18 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()
Previous Message legrand legrand 2020-04-08 12:32:54 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)