| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "'robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com'" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq |
| Date: | 2020-04-08 12:39:05 |
| Message-ID: | 3e56f2e4-454c-0fd9-d3ab-a8e6ab62defb@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/24/20 10:58 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 11/29/19 12:22 AM, nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>
>> I couldn't understand what you meant.
>> Do you say that we shouldn't change pqWait() behavior?
>> Or should I modify my patch to use pqDropConnection()?
>
> This patch no longer applies: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_27_2175.log
>
> CF entry has been updated to Waiting on Author.
>
> More importantly it looks like there is still no consensus on this
> patch, which is an uncommitted part of a previous patch [1].
>
> Unless somebody chimes in I'll mark this Returned with Feedback at the
> end of the CF.
Marked Returned with Feedback.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-04-08 12:43:18 | Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData() |
| Previous Message | legrand legrand | 2020-04-08 12:32:54 | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |