Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "daniel(at)yesql(dot)se" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target
Date: 2021-07-28 20:45:07
Message-ID: 3e3a6cf4-f56d-9424-6640-33b34c52836e@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 7/28/21 4:10 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
>>> - I am making _heavy_ use of GNU Make-isms, which does not improve
>>> long-term maintainability.
>> GNU Make is already a requirement, I don't see this shifting the needle in any
>> direction.
> As long as the .SECONDARYEXPANSION magic is clear enough to others, I'm
> happy.
>

We don't currently have any, and so many of us (including me) will have
to learn to understand it. But that's not to say it's unacceptable. If
there's no new infrastructure requirement then I'm OK with it.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-07-28 20:51:13 Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-07-28 20:28:12 Re: Use WaitLatch for {pre, post}_auth_delay instead of pg_usleep