| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
| Date: | 2021-01-24 20:12:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3d982f60ba2c897131dccc7111ae05ca40b33d0a.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 15:30 +0100, I wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 13:09 +0000, osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>
> > > My vote is that we should not have a GUC for such an unlikely event, and that
> > > stopping recovery is good enough.
> > OK. IIUC, my current patch for this fix doesn't need to be changed or withdrawn.
> > Thank you for your explanation.
>
> Well, that's just my opinion.
>
> Fujii Masao seemed to disagree with the patch, and his voice carries weight.
I think you should pst another patch where the second, now superfluous,
error message is removed.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Rofail | 2021-01-24 20:46:49 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Previous Message | Mark Rofail | 2021-01-24 18:24:43 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |