| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vinod Sridharan <vsridh90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes |
| Date: | 2025-05-02 21:15:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3d2b0417-693b-4444-990a-be6178cef549@vondra.me |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/30/25 14:39, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> On 4/18/25 03:03, Vinod Sridharan wrote:
>> ...
>>
>
> The patch seems fine to me - I repeated the tests with mailing list
> archives, with MemoryContextStats() in _gin_parallel_merge, and it
> reliably minimizes the memory usage. So that's fine.
>
> I was also worried if this might have performance impact, but it
> actually seems to make it a little bit faster.
>
> I'll get this pushed.
>
And pushed, so it'll be in beta1.
Thanks!
--
Tomas Vondra
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-05-02 21:21:21 | Re: Improve explicit cursor handling in pg_stat_statements |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-05-02 20:17:34 | Re: POC: Parallel processing of indexes in autovacuum |