Re: make installcheck-world in a clean environment

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make installcheck-world in a clean environment
Date: 2019-02-04 03:53:58
Message-ID: 3d2a3aeb-b360-8906-03f6-077fb30a25b8@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

04.02.2019 5:09, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:58:13AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>> Rebased the patch once more after d3c09b9b.
> Moved to next CF, waiting on author as the patch conflicts with HEAD.
> --
> Michael
Hello Michael,
It's very strange, I looked at http://cfbot.cputube.org/next.html from
time to time (last time, two days ago) and the patch passed all checks
just fine.
Also I've tried to apply make-installcheck-v5.patch from
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/dabc52ea-14b6-3109-26b1-e83a9dc62cc0@gmail.com,
it applies cleanly.
Can you explain, what exactly conflicts with HEAD?

Best regards,
Alexander

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-02-04 03:54:22 Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-02-04 03:48:04 Re: Why are we PageInit'ing buffers in RelationAddExtraBlocks()?