| From: | Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_monitor role description |
| Date: | 2021-05-20 18:25:54 |
| Message-ID: | 3cdb4a76-fce7-1d0e-ab93-1e4e42e3c3fb@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 20.05.2021 21:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
>> So, is it correct to change description of pg_monitor role from:
>> "Read/execute various monitoring views and functions. This role is a member of|pg_read_all_settings|,|pg_read_all_stats| and|pg_stat_scan_tables|."
>> to
>> "Read/execute various monitoring views and functions. The roles pg_read_all_settings, pg_read_all_stats and pg_stat_scan_tables are members of this role."
> No, it is not. That wording implies that the built-in grants are like
>
> GRANT pg_monitor TO pg_read_all_settings
>
> and so on, where the truth is the opposite.
I'm totally confused. I'm taking timeout to think about it.
--
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2021-05-20 21:02:30 | Re: Additional Chapter for Tutorial |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-20 18:10:08 | Re: pg_monitor role description |