| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher |
| Date: | 2017-05-05 14:50:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3c52df45-a97f-d048-e231-2e09934a5d08@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/5/17 01:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The only code path doing HOT-pruning and generating WAL is
> heap_page_prune(). Do you think that we need to worry about FPWs as
> well?
>
> Attached is an updated patch, which also forbids the run of any
> replication commands when the stopping state is reached.
I have committed this without the HOT pruning change. That can be
considered separately, and I think it could use another round of
thinking about it.
I will move the open item to "Older Bugs" now, because the user
experience regression, so to speak, in version 10 has been addressed.
(This could be a backpatching candidate, but I am not planning on it for
next week's releases in any case.)
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-05 14:56:40 | Re: compiler warning with VS 2017 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-05 14:35:35 | Re: Why type coercion is not performed for parameters? |