Re: more C99 cleanup

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more C99 cleanup
Date: 2025-12-02 07:27:50
Message-ID: 3be4d0a2-91a1-4425-90ae-640c1fb821ca@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25.11.25 06:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 21.11.25 15:03, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 2:50 AM Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> + * %z doesn't actually act differently from %Z on Windows.
>>
>> Probably obsolete too, at least according to:
>>
>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/
>> strftime-wcsftime-strftime-l-wcsftime-l?view=msvc-170
>
> Right, we could got back to using %z on all platforms, as originally
> attempted by commit ad5d46a4494.

I decided not to go further into researching and/or changing this, so I
just updated the comment to indicate that the previously stated problems
might now be obsolete.

With that, all the patches mentioned in this thread have been committed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2025-12-02 07:28:00 Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-12-02 07:19:13 RE: Parallel Apply