From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Windows vs recovery tests |
Date: | 2022-01-12 22:22:37 |
Message-ID: | 3b39b80a-475c-7d47-12f8-b63e9b1d8e3f@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/12/22 16:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> For some considerable time the recovery tests have been at best flaky on
>> Windows, and at worst disastrous (i.e. they can hang rather than just
>> fail).
> How long is "some considerable time"? I'm wondering if this isn't
> the same issue under discussion in
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKG%2BOeoETZQ%3DQw5Ub5h3tmwQhBmDA%3DnuNO3KG%3DzWfUypFAw%40mail.gmail.com
>
>
many months - this isn't a new thing.
I'm going to set up a system where I run the test in a fairly tight loop
and see if I can find out more.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2022-01-12 22:33:17 | Re: A qsort template |
Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2022-01-12 22:17:25 | Re: Avoid erroring out when unable to remove or parse logical rewrite files to save checkpoint work |