Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

From: Daniel Migowski <dmigowski(at)ikoffice(dot)de>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2019-08-02 08:25:30
Message-ID: 3ab03f54-b2bd-4b19-d8fb-19579df67caa@ikoffice.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am 01.08.2019 um 18:56 schrieb Konstantin Knizhnik:
> I decided to implement your proposal. Much simple version of
> autoprepare patch is attached.
> At my computer I got the following results:
>
>  pgbench -M simple -S         22495 TPS
>  pgbench -M extended -S    47633 TPS
>  pgbench -M prepared -S    47683 TPS
>
>
> So autoprepare speedup execution of queries sent using extended
> protocol more than twice and it is almost the same as with explicitly
> prepared statements.
> I failed to create regression test for it because I do not know how to
> force psql to use extended protocol. Any advice is welcome.

I am very interested in such a patch, because currently I use the same
functionality within my JDBC driver and having this directly in
PostgreSQL would surely speed things up.

I have two suggestions however:

1. Please allow to gather information about the autoprepared statements
by returning them in pg_prepared_statements view. I would love to
monitor usage of them as well as the memory consumption that occurs. I
suggested a patch to display that in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/41ED3F5450C90F4D8381BC4D8DF6BBDCF02E10B4@EXCHANGESERVER.ikoffice.de

2. Please not only use a LRU list, but maybe something which would
prefer statements that get reused at all. We often create ad hoc
statements with parameters which don't really need to be kept. Maybe I
can suggest an implementation of an LRU list where a reusal of a
statement not only pulls it to the top of the list but also increases a
reuse counter. When then a statement would drop off the end of the list
one checks if the reusal count is non-zero, and only really drops it if
the resual count is zero. Else the reusal count is decremented (or
halved) and the element is also placed at the start of the LRU list, so
it is kept a bit longer.

Thanks,

Daniel Migowski

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-08-02 08:34:24 Re: pgbench - implement strict TPC-B benchmark
Previous Message Adrien Nayrat 2019-08-02 07:53:40 Re: idea: log_statement_sample_rate - bottom limit for sampling