Re: A problem presentaion about ECPG, DECLARE STATEMENT

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A problem presentaion about ECPG, DECLARE STATEMENT
Date: 2019-09-11 12:32:05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Kuroda-san,

> This feature, committed last February, has some bugs.
> ...
> * This syntax does not have oracle compatibility.

This in itself is not a bug. If the syntax is not standard compliant,
then it's a bug. That of course does not mean we would not like to be
Oracle compatible where possible.

> In order to modify bugs, I think many designs, implementations,
> and specifications should be changed.

I hope the authors of said patch speak up and explain why they
implemented it as is.

> Is it acceptable for PG12?

In general absolutely.

Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2019-09-11 12:37:59 Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-09-11 12:30:09 Re: Write visibility map during CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL