From: | James Russell <internationalhobo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Sequential scan being used despite indexes |
Date: | 2006-02-01 03:14:47 |
Message-ID: | 3a3a16930601311914w5bd7d1d0hde7b4e495e0deb27@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi there,
I'm running a simple query with 2 inner joins (say A, B and C). Each of the
join columns has indexes. If I run queries that join just A and B, or just B
and C, postgres uses indexes. But if I run "A join B join C" then the "B
join C" part starts using a sequential scan and I can't figure out why.
Here's the query, which basically retrieves all meta-data for all messages
in a given forum. The relationship is pretty simple. Forums contain threads,
which contain messages, which each have associated meta-data:
SELECT message.message_id, message_meta_data.value
FROM thread
JOIN message USING (thread_id)
JOIN message_meta_data ON (
message.message_id=message_meta_data.message_id)
WHERE thread.forum_id=123;
Explaining:
Hash Join (cost=337.93..1267.54 rows=180 width=35)
Hash Cond: ("outer".message_id = "inner".message_id)
-> Seq Scan on message_meta_data (cost=0.00..739.19 rows=37719 width=30)
-> Hash (cost=337.79..337.79 rows=57 width=13)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..337.79 rows=57 width=13)
-> Index Scan using thread_forum_id_idx on thread (cost=
0.00..41.61 rows=13 width=4)
Index Cond: (forum_id = 6)
-> Index Scan using message_thread_id_idx on message (cost=
0.00..22.72 rows=5 width=17)
Index Cond: ("outer".thread_id = message.thread_id)
As you can see, the message and message_meta_data tables use a Seq Scan. The
only way I can think of forcing it to use the Index Scan in all cases would
be to use two separate nested queries: The outer query would retrieve the
list of messages in the forum, and the inner query would retrieve the list
of metadata for an individual message. Obviously I want to avoid having to
do that if possible.
Any ideas?
Many thanks if you can help.
James
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-02-01 03:29:51 | Re: Sequential scan being used despite indexes |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-02-01 02:47:03 | Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries |