From: | "D(dot) Dante Lorenso" <dante(at)lorenso(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Natural upgrade path for RedHat 9? |
Date: | 2004-01-09 03:13:41 |
Message-ID: | 3FFE1C65.40107@lorenso.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
This isn't entirely PG related, but...
Does anyone know what the natural upgrade path from
RedHat 9 is? I'm wondering if anyone on the PostgreSQL
team is working with redhat to package and bundle versions
of PostgreSQL for the latest redhat.
Is there going to be a RedHat 10? Or are we all supposed
to choose a path of RH Enterprise vs Fedora Core? I have
about 10 to 20 Redhat 9 machines in dev/qa/production that
I'm trying to plan the futures for.
Any sysadmins/dbs wanna chime in on this? And no, no OS flame
wars...I just wanna know about RedHat9 --> going forward. This
is what I'm building now:
- RedHat 9
- PostgreSQL 7.4
- Apache 1.3.29 / Mod_SSL 2.8.16-1.3.29
<./source/mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29.tar.gz>
- PHP 4.3.4
- Java J2SE 1.4.2
Like...for instance, will my build in 6 months look something
like this?
- RedHat 10, Fedora Core ?, RedHat Enterprise ?
- PostgreSQL 7.x
- Apache 2.x / Mod_SSL <./source/mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29.tar.gz>
- PHP 5.0
- Java J2SE 1.5
Thanks,
Dante
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2004-01-09 03:22:59 | Re: Backend start-up failed FATAL : non-superuser |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2004-01-09 02:54:26 | Re: Backend start-up failed FATAL : non-superuser |