Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Date: 2003-12-29 08:45:15
Message-ID: 3FEFE99B.7020804@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Chris Travers wrote:
> The example I gave was one where my app was designed to replace the old way
> of doing things (in this case excel). Replacing an Excel spreadsheet with a
> database-driven appliation is one area where you have no additional risk of
> information loss when you are running any RDBMS on the system.
>
> Also, here in Indonesia, most of these B&B's charge less than $30/night.
> Purchasing a new system (often $700 or more) is the equivalent of 23
> room-nights (for a place which typically has fewer than 10 rooms). Used
> PC's are out of the question because usually they have hardware issues, and
> so the cost savings would be marginal.
>
> Please remember that the economic tradeoff of whether to buy an additional
> system varies quite a bit around the world. For this reason, I decided to
> build my application to be platform and database agnostic, supporting both
> Firebird and PostgreSQL.

So one more reason to buy cheap hardware and avoid to pay M$ licenses or
not ?

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony 2003-12-29 09:10:26 Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-12-29 07:38:18 Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Sidney-Woollett 2003-12-29 08:46:09 Re: Change onership of database and all tables? (fwd)
Previous Message John Sidney-Woollett 2003-12-29 08:30:49 Re: Change onership of database and all tables? (fwd)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony 2003-12-29 09:10:26 Re: [GENERAL] Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2003-12-29 08:35:32 Re: *sigh*