Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

From: Sai Hertz And Control Systems <sank89(at)sancharnet(dot)in>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: aspire420(at)hotpop(dot)com, pgsql-advocay(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Date: 2003-12-26 17:46:11
Message-ID: 3FEC73E3.8060101@sancharnet.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Dear Jan Wieck ,

>> http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/News-5.0.x.html
>>
>> Does this concern anyone.
>
> It seems to concern MySQL now at least. They have changed their minds
> on many enterprise features that PostgreSQL has for years. The
> strategy of misguiding people like "you don't need foreign keys", "you
> don't need stored procedures", "yadda yadda triggers", "blah blah
> views" didn't work forever. So they have to add or propose those
> features one by one.

Thats very well said
I never thought of this. Now I have a tool to bash my peers who are
tilted toward MySQL .

> Let's see them when they're done, okay?

Joining you :-)

Regards ,
Vishal Kashyap

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-12-26 18:02:58 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-12-26 17:43:36 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-12-26 17:51:47 Re: Nested Transactions in 7.5??
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-12-26 17:43:36 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2003-12-26 17:49:20 Re: feature request: \qf datatype
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-12-26 17:43:36 Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ?