From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
Date: | 2003-12-15 18:23:14 |
Message-ID: | 3FDDFC12.608@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>> Now for the fun
>>part (signals).
>>
>>
>
>Actually, no. I thought fork/exec would be a real mess (as did Tom),
>but Claudio has done an excellent job of producing a minimal patch. The
>work isn't done yet, but this small patch has taken us much closer, so I
>assume signals will be even easier.
>
Well, it's speculation on both our parts :-). ISTM we'll need an
explicit event loop to check the shmem (or whatever we use to simulate
signals) every so often - maybe that will be easy, I don't know - I'm
interested to see what turns up. (Of course, if we were threaded we'd
just need a thread to watch for the event ...)
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2003-12-15 18:39:05 | Locale-based identifier conversion and Turkish |
Previous Message | Claudia D'amato | 2003-12-15 16:59:28 | postgres does not respond to a query view of 10000 records roughl y |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-15 19:44:09 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-15 03:41:34 | Re: fork/exec patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-15 19:44:09 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2003-12-15 13:31:57 | Re: fork/exec patch |