Re: tuning questions

From: Rob Fielding <rob(at)dsvr(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tuning questions
Date: 2003-12-04 17:13:19
Message-ID: 3FCF6B2F.3070802@dsvr.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance


>
> I've tweaked shared buffers to 8192, pushed sort memory to 2048, vacuum
> memory to 8192, and effective cache size to 10000.
> /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax is set to 1600000000 and /proc/sys/fs/file-max
> is set to 65536. Ulimit -n 3192.

Your sharedmemory is too high, and not even being used effectivey. Your
other settings are too low.

Ball park guessing here, but I'd say first read (and understand) this:

http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html

Then make shared memory about 10-20% available ram, and set:

((shmmax/1024) - ( 14.2 * max_connections ) - 250 ) / 8.2 = shared_buffers

decrease random_page_cost to 0.3 and wack up sort mem by 16 times,
effective cache size to about 50% RAM (depending on your other settings)
and try that for starters.

--

Rob Fielding
rob(at)dsvr(dot)net

www.dsvr.co.uk Development Designer Servers Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-12-04 17:26:38 Re: tuning questions
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-12-04 17:04:06 Re: Minor (very) feature request...

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-12-04 17:26:38 Re: tuning questions
Previous Message William Yu 2003-12-04 17:06:33 Re: Has anyone run on the new G5 yet