| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Alex <alex(at)meerkatsoft(dot)com>, Lada 'Ray' Lostak <ray(at)unreal64(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable |
| Date: | 2003-12-01 21:41:42 |
| Message-ID: | 3FCBB596.1070200@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joe Conway wrote:
>>The description is a statement because the option is boolean, i.e. the
>>statement "Datetimes are integer based" is either "true" or "false"
>>("on" or "off", etc). How stongly do you feel about it? I don't think
>>"integer_datetime_storage" is accurate in any case.
>
> Not strongly. Keep it unchanged.
>
Any more thoughts on block_size (or page_size)?
Thanks,
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-12-01 21:46:49 | Re: Good open source mailing list system PHP / Postgresql |
| Previous Message | alpheta | 2003-12-01 21:37:54 | Shared hosting configuration advice requested |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-01 21:48:32 | Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-01 21:36:06 | Re: Numeric version of factorial() |