Re: performance versus order of fields in row

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: stimits(at)comcast(dot)net, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: performance versus order of fields in row
Date: 2003-11-26 03:57:16
Message-ID: 3FC4249C.8050406@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

>"D. Stimits" <stimits(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>I'm not looking for an exact answer here, but instead something more
>>"rule of thumb". If I have a table with many fields, and I retrieving
>>small groups of fields during a SELECT, whereby the groups of fields are
>>indexed and/or clustered, will I get a faster select in the left-most
>>fields, or the right-most fields? Or will it not matter?
>>
>>
>
>Fields earlier in the table definition (further to the left) are
>marginally faster to access than ones further to the right. I doubt it
>would be real noticeable unless you had hundreds of fields altogether.
>

Do we still "cache" field offsets for not-nullable-fixed-size columns?

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-11-26 04:16:23 Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
Previous Message Uwe C. Schroeder 2003-11-26 03:53:03 Re: Lock strategies!