| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4 |
| Date: | 2003-11-19 00:55:14 |
| Message-ID: | 3FBABF72.8000604@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
> I think the opposit:
>
> Once the PITR is written it can be used for Replication as side
> effect.
>
Command Prompt has found the opposite to be the case. It is our
replication product
that is going to allow PITR, even from 7.3.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
> For example the Sybase Replication is implemented in this way.
>
>
> Regards
> Gaetano Mendola
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-11-19 02:25:55 | Re: performance problem |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-11-19 00:21:37 | Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Hampl | 2003-11-19 01:17:27 | Re: indexing with lower(...) -> queries are not optimised very well |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-11-19 00:21:37 | Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4 |