| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 15:54:08 |
| Message-ID: | 3FBA40A0.60108@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am ready to work with anyone to make fork/exec happen. It requires we
>
>find out what globals are being set by the postmaster, and have the
>child run those same routines. I can show you examples of what I have
>done and walk you through areas that need work. If you look at the
>EXEC_BACKEND defines in CVS, you can see what I have done so far. We
>need to have EXEC_BACKEND working on Unix first, then we can add the
>CreateProcess call on Win32, so all this can be done on Unix first.
>
>
How is EXEC_BACKEND going to be enabled? A configure option? A global
define?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-18 15:59:15 | Fwd: Articles in Italian |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-18 15:18:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoper Smiga | 2003-11-18 16:05:29 | Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-18 15:18:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |