Re: oh dear ...

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: oh dear ...
Date: 2003-11-16 01:50:14
Message-ID: 3FB6D7D6.2010306@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I made up a more thorough regression test for date input formats, and
> found that there were still some cases that were rejected :-(. Attached
> is a more complete patch that handles all month-name cases, and
> explicitly can not change the behavior when there's not a textual month
> name. Documentation addition and regression test included.
>
> I'd like some further review of this before I risk applying it to 7.4
> though ... anyone have time today?

Hi Tom,

Everything passes for me on FreeBSD 4.8, latest CVS, "gmake check", with
your patch applied.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-11-16 02:18:48 Re: source version?
Previous Message bpalmer 2003-11-16 01:36:08 source version?