Re: oh dear ...

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: oh dear ...
Date: 2003-11-15 04:51:15
Message-ID: 3FB5B0C3.5070102@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> The pgstat patch has already been checked to my satisfaction, but the
> datetime patch needs more eyeballs on it; anyone out there have time to
> look at it?

FWIW, it looks good to me, seems to work as intended, and passes all
existing regression tests.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-15 05:01:55 Re: oh dear ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-15 04:42:10 Re: oh dear ...