Re: About the partial tarballs

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Marko Karppinen <marko(at)karppinen(dot)fi>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About the partial tarballs
Date: 2003-11-12 03:29:52
Message-ID: 3FB1A930.5000302@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Even if they weren't useful for anything else, I think there's value in the
> developers having to consider what is optional and what is not. This need
> for constant review probably reduces the chance of bloat, over time even
> in the full tarball.

How about dropping the partial tarballs and using the space savings to
distribute a .tar.bz2 archive as well.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-12 03:35:18 Re: 7.4RC2 regression failur and not running stats collector process on Solaris
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-12 03:27:46 Re: Darwin Startup Script Patch