Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>>I agree in general with you for these "general" arguments, but here we
>>are talking about to introduce a sleep ( removable by guc ) or not! What
>>about the hash refactoring introduced with 7.4? Are you going to
>>discourage people to use the hash?
> Hashed subselect handling was tested by lots of people during a lot of
> time, and was subject of the working port reports the last few days.
> This patch has had none of those.
> Of course, if you want to patch your servers with it no one will stop
> you, but it will be _your_ responsability. You can do any amount of
> testing you want to make sure it's good enough for you. And you are
> welcome to report how it did behave.
I will with pleasure.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: markw||Date: 2003-11-04 19:03:17|
|Subject: Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL 7.3.4 and 7.4beta5 |
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2003-11-04 18:51:41|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak|